User Tools

Site Tools


training:inventory_oddity_of_8_to_14_digit_part_numbers

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
training:inventory_oddity_of_8_to_14_digit_part_numbers [2017/06/07 15:32 (7 years ago)] – [System Five treats 8 to 14 digit part numbers as barcodes] sjacksontraining:inventory_oddity_of_8_to_14_digit_part_numbers [2017/06/07 15:33 (7 years ago)] (current) – [System Five treats 8 to 14 digit part numbers as barcodes] sjackson
Line 3: Line 3:
 An 8 to 14, all-digit (just 0 to 9's), part number in System Five will be treated as a barcode. An 8 to 14, all-digit (just 0 to 9's), part number in System Five will be treated as a barcode.
  
-Each part in System Five can have one or more barcodes attached to it on the Alternate Supplier tab.  The benefit is that on an invoice or purchase order, either the part number or the barcode can be entered or scanned, and the correct part will be found and added to the invoice or purchase order.+Each part in System Five can have one or more barcodes attached to it on its Alternate Supplier tab.  The benefit is that on an invoice or purchase order, either the part number or the barcode can be entered or scanned, and the correct part will be found and added to the invoice or purchase order.
  
 Now imagine a part number **01700030** being created for an ice cream bar.  Then, a UPC barcode **077567254252** added for the ice cream on its Alternate Suppliers tab.  On an invoice, either **01700030** or **077567254252** could be entered or scanned to add the ice cream to the invoice. Now imagine a part number **01700030** being created for an ice cream bar.  Then, a UPC barcode **077567254252** added for the ice cream on its Alternate Suppliers tab.  On an invoice, either **01700030** or **077567254252** could be entered or scanned to add the ice cream to the invoice.
training/inventory_oddity_of_8_to_14_digit_part_numbers.txt · Last modified: 2017/06/07 15:33 (7 years ago) by sjackson